My Lord Archbishop.
As someone who wished to see John of York who I believe to be a man of the people, become Archbishop of Canterbury I have kept my own council about your good self as I know little to nothing about you.
It is with great pleasure that I note your stand against Pay-Day Loans and your intention to combat them commercially by promoting the Credit Unions. A group of us on our estate are exploring the possibilities of forming a credit union so it was encouraging to hear you promoting them. I was also impressed by your commonsense comment that Pay-Day Loans fill a void left by the normal financial institutions when many families find themselves on hard times
My wife and I who are lucky enough to own our home live on an estate that is 60% social housing, the official figure for child poverty on the estate is 1 in 4 but with the introduction of the so called bedroom tax and the hardship that this is causing I feel that the figure is now 1 in 3, so there is a ready market for Pay-Day Loans, Logbook loans and loan sharks.
The only long term answer to this problem is full time employment that pays a living wage of £8-50 per hour to replace the miserly minimum wage of under £6-50 per hour which is a disgrace and needs to be supplemented by benefits to allow people to survive. Some will say that £8-50 per hour is far too high but a 40 hour week at that rate would gross £17,600 per annum which is only half the average wage.
We the working class need a spokesperson to speak for us with authority to bang the drum of condemnation in the House of Lords to be a thorn in the side of government. I hope that you will be that person.
Yours
Peter
Home Counties Coordinator
Working Class Action
Friday, 13 September 2013
Warrington bombing linked to Red Action
2
September 2013 Last updated at 00:49 BST
Twenty years after the Warrington bombings, Inside Out investigates why the
case has never been solved.
A bomb, which was placed in a litter bin in the busy Bridge Street shopping area, injured 56 people and killed two children - Johnathan Ball and Tim Parry.
Inside Out investigates and asks if the security services were looking in the right places, at the right times and at the right people.
The programme examines whether there is a possible link between the attack and a now defunct group called Red Action, an ultra-left wing anti-fascist group, which had members in Liverpool, Manchester and London.
Professor Richard English, a leading authority on the IRA, also responds to the theory that Red Action may have been involved.
Inside Out is broadcast on Monday, 2 September at 19:30 BST on BBC One North West and nationwide on the iPlayer for seven days thereafter.
Source: BBC News
A bomb, which was placed in a litter bin in the busy Bridge Street shopping area, injured 56 people and killed two children - Johnathan Ball and Tim Parry.
Inside Out investigates and asks if the security services were looking in the right places, at the right times and at the right people.
The programme examines whether there is a possible link between the attack and a now defunct group called Red Action, an ultra-left wing anti-fascist group, which had members in Liverpool, Manchester and London.
Professor Richard English, a leading authority on the IRA, also responds to the theory that Red Action may have been involved.
Inside Out is broadcast on Monday, 2 September at 19:30 BST on BBC One North West and nationwide on the iPlayer for seven days thereafter.
Source: BBC News
Saturday, 1 December 2012
Kent Police superintendent arrested over theft not charged
Supt Rachel Adams, who was area commander of Medway police, was arrested on 27 August in Kings Hill near Mereworth.
Kent Police said the Crown Prosecution Service had decided not to charge her. A spokeswoman for the force said she remained suspended from duty pending a decision over disciplinary proceedings.
Source: BBC News
After a brief Google her name comes up on a FIO request re Common Purpose, surprise surprise, it would appear that Superintendent Adams is a Common Purpose graduate
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/public_benefit_of_paymentsdonati
ONE RULE FOR THEM, ANOTHER ONE FOR US
TIME TO END PUBLIC FINANCING OF COMMON PURPOSE, THE NEW BOYS NETWORK
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
Child sex abuse still happening in Rochdale claims health worker
Girls are still being abused in
Rochdale despite nine men being convicted of running a child sex ring in the
town, a health worker has said.
Sara Rowbotham, from the Rochdale Crisis Intervention Team, is tasked with identifying young people vulnerable to child sex exploitation.
She told an inquiry that agencies had treated the victims "appallingly".
The team co-ordinator also told the Home Affairs Select Committee the abuse had started in 2004 and not 2007.
'Still sexual exploitation'
Rochdale Crisis Intervention Team identifies young people thought to be some of society's most vulnerable and helps with their sexual health.
"In Rochdale, there is still sexual exploitation," Ms Rowbotham said.
"We are attending strategy meetings where these concerns have been raised."
Children involved are about 14 or 15 years old, she said.
 |
| Sara Rowbotham |
She said she had made 103 referrals of "incredibly vulnerable" cases to police and social services between 2005 and 2011 and there had been only nine convictions in May that she was aware of.
The ex-chief executive of Rochdale Council, which was criticised for staff "deficiencies" in a report by the town's safeguarding children board, told the hearing he knew nothing of the abuse until the men's arrests in 2010.
Roger Ellis told the committee as chief executive he had "felt a deep sense of responsibility" and was "embarrassed at the authority's failings", but not personally.
The council was criticised in the report for failing to help the victims,
"I don't feel any personal culpability based on the information that was available to me," he said.
Mr Ellis, who was chief executive for 12 years, said "clearly information was withheld" from him by staff.
"I did not know about these particular issues. I can't explain why I wasn't made aware [of] what was happening."
Mr Ellis left the authority in 2010. When asked if he received a pay-off, he told the committee he could not reveal the amount due to "confidentiality".
He agreed there should be a judicial inquiry into what had happened in Rochdale to find out "who had failed" the children.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-20220556
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Sex crime nursery worker Alexander Mortimer has jail term cut
A nursery worker from Lanarkshire who
was jailed for eight years for filming himself abusing young boys has had his
prison term cut by appeal judges.
Alexander Mortimer, 28, admitted assaulting the boys, taking indecent photographs of children, and possessing indecent images.
His lawyers successfully argued he was not given a large enough sentence reduction for his early guilty plea.
Appeal judges reduced his prison term to five years and 11 months.
When he was sentenced, the High Court in Edinburgh heard how Mortimer filmed and photographed the abuse he carried out, and was found to have 17,967 indecent images and 582 videos on his computer.
Read More: BBC News
Shamed peer allowed back into House of Lords despite failing to repay a penny of her £125,000 false expenses
- Baroness Uddin owns three properties with her husband but says she is 'too poor' to repay money
- Peer had 'never been seen' at main home in Maidstone
- Fears she will use tax-free £300-per-day House of Lords allowance to slowly pay back £125k
Shamed Labour peer Baroness Uddin will be allowed to return to her seat in the House of Lords, despite failing to repay a penny of the money she was fined for cheating on her expenses.
Lady Uddin, the first female Muslim peer, was booted out of the Lords for 18 months and ordered to repay £125,000.
Despite owning three properties with her husband, she claims she is now too poor to repay the money. It has emerged the Lords authorities are powerless to prevent Lady Uddin, whose suspension ends in April, from returning.
A ruling by the committee for privileges and conduct in the Lords says that it would be illegal to make her return conditional on the repayment of the money.
Lady Uddin was exposed as a cheat in May 2009 after it was reported that she had never been seen at her designated ‘main home’ in Maidstone, Kent.
The small flat allowed her to claim £174 a night while she was living at her family home in Wapping, East London, provided by a housing association.
Lady Uddin has always denied wrongdoing, but an investigation by the Lords authorities found she had deliberately exploited the system to boost her income. The failure to prevent the peer returning to the Lords has angered her fellow peers.
They fear that Lady Uddin wants to use her peers’ tax-free allowance of £300 a day to gradually pay back her debts
.
If she attended the House of Lords frequently, she could pay back all £125,000 in three years – meaning she would end up repaying taxpayers with their own money.
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Oakeshott said: ‘It can’t be right to let a disgraced peer back before they have repaid their bogus expenses. If you do not pay your fines, you go to prison.’
His view is shared by a sub-committee on Lords’ conduct which has warned that she should not be allowed to come back until the money has been repaid.
Fellow expenses cheats in the Lords have either paid back the money or have vowed to do so before they return. Lord Hanningfield has promised to pay back £30,000, while fellow Conservative Lord Taylor of Warwick has paid back his full amount of £24,000.
Lady Uddin has declined to comment. When the scandal broke, she insisted that she had stayed regularly in the Kent home. The CPS said she would not face charges on the grounds it was ruled that a ‘main house’ might be visited only once a month.
Read more: Daily Mail
Expenses: Police Unable To Use MacShane Letters
Disgraced former minister's letters on false claims for thousands of pounds are
protected by parliamentary privilege.
Denis MacShane stepped down as an MP after a damning report from the Commons
expenses watchdog found he had wrongly claimed thousands of pounds.
The report said he submitted 19 false invoices "plainly intended to deceive" Parliament's expenses authority - which said the case was the "gravest" it had dealt with.
There are now calls for a police investigation into Mr MacShane's expense claims, which was dropped in July, to be reopened.
The Metropolitan Police said: "We are aware of the report and will be assessing its content in due course."
The letters, which were never shown to the original inquiry because of parliamentary privilege, are likely to be examined by the police, but are still protected from being used in court.
Clerk of the Journals Liam Laurence Smyth, who is responsible for parliamentary privilege issues, admitted that many people would find the situation "surprising", but said privilege was necessary for Parliament to function effectively.
Even if Mr MacShane had openly admitted criminal behaviour in his evidence, the police would not be able to rely on the comments in court, he said.
However, he suggested the police might now be able to use the letters as a "map" to further their own enquiries.
Conservative MP Philip Davies, who urged the Met to reopen its investigation, said it was a "sad state of affairs" that Mr MacShane was protected by parliamentary privilege.
"All it will do is further undermine the reputation of Parliament," he said.
"There will be millions of people out there who think that MPs are above the law and that is what the perception will be."
Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon found the MP had entered 19 "misleading" expenses claims for research and translation services from a body called the European Policy Institute (EPI), signed by its supposed general manager.
However, the institute did not exist "in this form" by the time in question and the general manager's signature was provided by Mr MacShane himself or someone else "under his authority".
One letter from the MP to Mr Lyon in October 2009 described how he drew funds from the EPI so he could serve on a book-judging panel in Paris.
"I appreciate the committee's ruling that I made no personal gain and I regret my foolishness in the manner I chose to be reimbursed for work including working as the Prime Minister's personal envoy in Europe," he said.
Letters in which a former Labour minister admitted expenses
abuses cannot be used to prosecute him because they are protected by
parliamentary privilege, an official has said.
The report said he submitted 19 false invoices "plainly intended to deceive" Parliament's expenses authority - which said the case was the "gravest" it had dealt with.
There are now calls for a police investigation into Mr MacShane's expense claims, which was dropped in July, to be reopened.
The Metropolitan Police said: "We are aware of the report and will be assessing its content in due course."
The letters, which were never shown to the original inquiry because of parliamentary privilege, are likely to be examined by the police, but are still protected from being used in court.
Clerk of the Journals Liam Laurence Smyth, who is responsible for parliamentary privilege issues, admitted that many people would find the situation "surprising", but said privilege was necessary for Parliament to function effectively.
Even if Mr MacShane had openly admitted criminal behaviour in his evidence, the police would not be able to rely on the comments in court, he said.
However, he suggested the police might now be able to use the letters as a "map" to further their own enquiries.
Conservative MP Philip Davies, who urged the Met to reopen its investigation, said it was a "sad state of affairs" that Mr MacShane was protected by parliamentary privilege.
"All it will do is further undermine the reputation of Parliament," he said.
"There will be millions of people out there who think that MPs are above the law and that is what the perception will be."
Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon found the MP had entered 19 "misleading" expenses claims for research and translation services from a body called the European Policy Institute (EPI), signed by its supposed general manager.
However, the institute did not exist "in this form" by the time in question and the general manager's signature was provided by Mr MacShane himself or someone else "under his authority".
One letter from the MP to Mr Lyon in October 2009 described how he drew funds from the EPI so he could serve on a book-judging panel in Paris.
"I appreciate the committee's ruling that I made no personal gain and I regret my foolishness in the manner I chose to be reimbursed for work including working as the Prime Minister's personal envoy in Europe," he said.
MPs' Expenses: Denis MacShane Quits As MP
Denis MacShane declares he is stepping down as an MP after making false expenses
claims running to thousands of pounds.
It follows a damning report from the Commons expenses watchdog, which found Denis MacShane wrongly claimed thousands of pounds.
The report said he submitted 19 false invoices "plainly intended to deceive"
Parliament's expenses authority - which said the case was the "gravest" it had
dealt with.
The move came after the Labour Party declared the Rotherham MP's career to be "effectively over", and with Scotland Yard facing demands to reopen a criminal investigation.
Speaking of Mr MacShane's resignation, a senior Labour source said: "Denis has done the right thing."
A statement issued by former minister said: "I have been overwhelmed by messages of support for my work as an MP on a range of issues but I accept that my parliamentary career is over.
"I appreciate the committee's ruling that I made no personal gain and I regret my foolishness in the manner I chose to be reimbursed for work including working as the Prime Minister's personal envoy in Europe.
"I want to thank the people of Rotherham for allowing me to serve as their MP and the Labour Party for allowing me over the years to fight for the causes I believe in."
The committee's sanctions follow an investigation by Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon, who accused Mr MacShane of "extremely serious" rule-breaking.
It also emerged in today's report that the commissioner's findings had not been shared with the Metropolitan Police, which dropped its own lengthy inquiry into Mr MacShane without further action in July.
Conservative MP Philip Davies urged police to revisit the allegations against Mr MacShane armed with the detailed evidence in the commissioner's "astonishing" report.
In a letter to the Met, he wrote: "Now that the report has been published, and parliamentary privilege no longer applies, I would ask you to consider reopening the investigation into Mr MacShane."
Committee officials suggested that the evidence from Mr MacShane would not be legally admissible - even though it has not now been made public.
The committee said it was impossible to say how much Mr MacShane claimed "outside the rules" but estimated it "may have been in the order of £7,500".
Sky News
A former Labour minister has announced he is resigning as an MP
after being suspended from the Commons for making false expenses claims.
It follows a damning report from the Commons expenses watchdog, which found Denis MacShane wrongly claimed thousands of pounds.
The report said he submitted 19 false invoices "plainly intended to deceive"
Parliament's expenses authority - which said the case was the "gravest" it had
dealt with.The move came after the Labour Party declared the Rotherham MP's career to be "effectively over", and with Scotland Yard facing demands to reopen a criminal investigation.
Speaking of Mr MacShane's resignation, a senior Labour source said: "Denis has done the right thing."
A statement issued by former minister said: "I have been overwhelmed by messages of support for my work as an MP on a range of issues but I accept that my parliamentary career is over.
"I appreciate the committee's ruling that I made no personal gain and I regret my foolishness in the manner I chose to be reimbursed for work including working as the Prime Minister's personal envoy in Europe.
"I want to thank the people of Rotherham for allowing me to serve as their MP and the Labour Party for allowing me over the years to fight for the causes I believe in."
The committee's sanctions follow an investigation by Parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon, who accused Mr MacShane of "extremely serious" rule-breaking.
It also emerged in today's report that the commissioner's findings had not been shared with the Metropolitan Police, which dropped its own lengthy inquiry into Mr MacShane without further action in July.
Conservative MP Philip Davies urged police to revisit the allegations against Mr MacShane armed with the detailed evidence in the commissioner's "astonishing" report.
In a letter to the Met, he wrote: "Now that the report has been published, and parliamentary privilege no longer applies, I would ask you to consider reopening the investigation into Mr MacShane."
Committee officials suggested that the evidence from Mr MacShane would not be legally admissible - even though it has not now been made public.
The committee said it was impossible to say how much Mr MacShane claimed "outside the rules" but estimated it "may have been in the order of £7,500".
Sky News
Friday, 2 November 2012
Newsnight caught in fresh paedophile storm amid claims 'senior political figure' will be outed on show
The BBC has been dragged into a fresh storm over a second Newsnight paedophile investigation, it emerged today.
Editor of the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Iain Overton, mysteriously tweeted that a 'senior political figure' was to be outed as a child-abuser on the programme this evening.
The investigation about the unnamed man, who is alive, is being looked at by the BBC's legal team, MailOnline understands, but the corporation is refusing to confirm the probe exists.
This is despite Mr Overton's crystal clear message online: 'If all goes well we've got a Newsnight out tonight about a very senior political figure who is a paedophile.'
Mr Overton's bureau is a not-for-profit organisation which works with news outlets to publish in-depth investigations. It says it has been working on this project for the BBC.
It piles more pressure on the beleaguered corporation after last month it was revealed Newsnight dumped an investigation into paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile, even though they had interviewed his victims.
Channel Four political correspondent Michael Crick says he has spoken to the man at the centre of the allegations, who denied that he was a paedophile and said he would sue if Newsnight broadcasts anything on him tonight.
He also added that the man said he had not been approached for a comment by the BBC, despite it being earmarked for tonight's Newsnight.
The Metropolitan Police have told MailOnline they have not been handed anything on the subject of the investigation.
Read more: Daily Mail
Thursday, 1 November 2012
Freddie Starr arrested in Jimmy Savile abuse inquiry
Entertainer Freddie Starr has been
arrested in the police inquiry into sex abuse claims against Jimmy Savile.
Mr Starr, from Warwickshire, was arrested by Operation Yewtree officers on suspicion of sexual offences and has been taken into police custody locally.
He has denied claims he groped a girl of 14 while in a room with Savile.
Meanwhile, an independent review into BBC Newsnight's dropping of a programme about the allegations against Savile will report later this month.
Operation Yewtree is a Scotland Yard criminal inquiry into sexual abuse claims.
The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested a man in his 60s, from Warwickshire, at 17:45 GMT in connection with the investigation and was "taken into police custody locally".
Police said the individual fell under the strand of the investigation termed "Savile and others".
On Sunday, ex-pop star Gary Glitter was arrested and bailed after being questioned as part of the inquiry.
Glitter, 68, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was arrested at home and questioned at a London police station before being released on bail until mid-December.
Read more: BBC News
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)